Login / Signup

Evaluating the Wear of Resin Teeth by Different Opposing Restorative Materials.

Seunglee JinJae-Won ChoiChang-Mo JeongJung-Bo HuhSo-Hyoun LeeHyeonjong LeeMi-Jung Yun
Published in: Materials (Basel, Switzerland) (2019)
The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear properties of resin teeth with different opposing dental restorative materials. One type of resin tooth (Trubyte Biotone) was tested against six types of restorative materials including type III gold alloy (GO), monolithic zirconia (MZ), lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD), nickel-chromium alloy (NC), feldspathic ceramic (FC), and steatite (ST). Two-body wear tests were performed under a vertical load of 5 kgf and thermo-cycling at 5/55 °C with a total of 120,000 cycles. The wear amount was quantified by measuring the volume loss of the resin teeth and the vertical substance loss of the opposing materials using three-dimensional images. The FC group showed a significantly greater amount of wear of the resin teeth, followed by the ST, NC, LD, MZ, and GO groups. The GO group showed significantly less wear of resin teeth than the other groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the wear of opposing restorative materials between groups. Within the limits of this study, it is recommended that zirconia, rather than feldspathic ceramic, should be used for restorations in the esthetic zone, and gold alloy should be used for areas with little or no esthetic demand.
Keyphrases
  • type iii
  • cone beam computed tomography
  • convolutional neural network
  • ionic liquid
  • optical coherence tomography
  • oxide nanoparticles