Login / Signup

Climate change winners and losers among North American bumblebees.

Hanna M JacksonSarah A JohnsonLora A MorandinLeif L RichardsonLaura Melissa GuzmanLeithen K M'Gonigle
Published in: Biology letters (2022)
Mounting evidence suggests that climate change, agricultural intensification and disease are impacting bumblebee health and contributing to species' declines. Identifying how these factors impact insect communities at large spatial and temporal scales is difficult, partly because species may respond in different ways. Further, the necessary data must span large spatial and temporal scales, which usually means they comprise aggregated, presence-only records collected using numerous methods (e.g. diversity surveys, educational collections, citizen-science projects, standardized ecological surveys). Here, we use occupancy models, which explicitly correct for biases in the species observation process, to quantify the effect of changes in temperature, precipitation and floral resources on bumblebee site occupancy over the past 12 decades in North America. We find no evidence of genus-wide declines in site occupancy, but do find that occupancy is strongly related to temperature, and is only weakly related to precipitation or floral resources. We also find that more species are likely to be climate change 'losers' than 'winners' and that this effect is primarily associated with changing temperature. Importantly, all trends were highly species-specific, highlighting that genus or community-wide measures may not reflect diverse species-specific patterns that are critical in guiding allocation of conservation resources.
Keyphrases
  • climate change
  • human health
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • genetic diversity
  • risk assessment
  • electronic health record
  • heavy metals
  • big data
  • social media