Login / Signup

Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model.

Dipro MondalSophie VanbelleAlberto CasseseMath J J M Candel
Published in: Statistical methods in medical research (2024)
Reliability of measurement instruments providing quantitative outcomes is usually assessed by an intraclass correlation coefficient. When participants are repeatedly measured by a single rater or device, or, are each rated by a different group of raters, the intraclass correlation coefficient is based on a one-way analysis of variance model. When planning a reliability study, it is essential to determine the number of participants and measurements per participant (i.e. number of raters or number of repeated measurements). Three different sample size determination approaches under the one-way analysis of variance model were identified in the literature, all based on a confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficient. Although eight different confidence interval methods can be identified, Wald confidence interval with Fisher's large sample variance approximation remains most commonly used despite its well-known poor statistical properties. Therefore, a first objective of this work is comparing the statistical properties of all identified confidence interval methods-including those overlooked in previous studies. A second objective is developing a general procedure to determine the sample size using all approaches since a closed-form formula is not always available. This procedure is implemented in an R Shiny app. Finally, we provide advice for choosing an appropriate sample size determination method when planning a reliability study.
Keyphrases
  • diffusion weighted imaging
  • solid phase extraction
  • systematic review
  • molecularly imprinted
  • minimally invasive
  • type diabetes
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • weight loss
  • human milk
  • skeletal muscle
  • contrast enhanced