Mortality prediction after transcatheter treatment of failed bioprosthetic aortic valves utilizing various international scoring systems: Insights from the Valve-in-Valve International Data (VIVID).
Mina AzizMatheus SimonatoJohn G WebbMohamed Abdel-WahabDoff McElhinneyAlison DuncanDidier TchetcheMarco BarbantiAnna Sonia PetronioFrancesco MaisanoVasco Gama RibeiroDiego Felipe GaiaRuhina RanaViktor KockaMoses MathurHarindra WijeysunderaFarrel HelligHenrik NissenRaffi BekeredjianCharanjit RihalStephen J DuffyDanny DvirPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2018)
All three scores overestimated mortality at 30 days with ES II showing the highest predictability compared to LES and STS; and therefore, should be recommended for ViV procedures. There is a need for a dedicated scoring system for patients undergoing ViV interventions.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- aortic stenosis
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- patients undergoing
- mitral valve
- cardiovascular events
- risk factors
- physical activity
- electronic health record
- cardiovascular disease
- big data
- heart failure
- machine learning
- deep learning
- replacement therapy
- ejection fraction
- pulmonary arterial hypertension