Feasibility and acceptability of the "Never Events" method in the context of multi-agency child protection: findings from an exploratory study.

This report outlines an exploratory study that investigated whether the "Never Events" system - first used in healthcare contexts to identify and investigate preventable incidents that cause serious harm or death as a result of human error - could be adapted in the context of UK multi-agency child protection. Using a sequential design, two online surveys were carried out that explored practitioners' (n = 46) views about the feasibility of adopting the Never Events model and what, if any, incidents or events could be investigated plausibly using such a model. Practitioners were drawn from a purposive sample. An inter-disciplinary panel of senior practitioners - drawn from nursing, public health, social work and child mental health services- discussed the surveys' findings and the list of proposed child protection Never Events. The findings indicate that the complex, judgment-based nature of child protection contributes to difficulties creating shared understandings about what constitutes harm and the extent to which multi-agency systems can share decision-making and responsibility for the way they identify and support families. Thinking through and discussing the relative strengths and limitations of the Never Events model may nevertheless be a valuable exercise in interprofessional training and the design of highly localized review and reporting systems.