Login / Signup

The relevance of rock shape over mass-implications for rockfall hazard assessments.

Andrin CaviezelAdrian RingenbachSophia E DemmelClaire E DinneenNora KrebsYves BühlerMarc ChristenGuillaume MeyratAndreas StoffelElisabeth HafnerLucie A EberhardDaniel von RickenbachKevin SimmlerPhilipp MayerPascal S NiklausThomas BirchlerTim AebiLukas CavigelliMichael SchaffnerStefan RickliChristoph SchnetzlerMichele MagnoLuca BeniniPerry Bartelt
Published in: Nature communications (2021)
The mitigation of rapid mass movements involves a subtle interplay between field surveys, numerical modelling, and experience. Hazard engineers rely on a combination of best practices and, if available, historical facts as a vital prerequisite in establishing reproducible and accurate hazard zoning. Full-scale field tests have been performed to reinforce the physical understanding of debris flows and snow avalanches. Rockfall dynamics are - especially the quantification of energy dissipation during the complex rock-ground interaction - largely unknown. The awareness of rock shape dependence is growing, but presently, there exists little experimental basis on how rockfall hazard scales with rock mass, size, and shape. Here, we present a unique data set of induced single-block rockfall events comprising data from equant and wheel-shaped blocks with masses up to 2670 kg, quantifying the influence of rock shape and mass on lateral spreading and longitudinal runout and hence challenging common practices in rockfall hazard assessment.
Keyphrases