Login / Signup

Summarizing studies using constitutive genetic deficiency to investigate behavioural influences of uptake 2 monoamine transporters.

Brady L WeberJasmin N BeaverT Lee Gilman
Published in: Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology (2022)
Burgeoning literature demonstrates that monoamine transporters with high transport capacity but lower substrate affinity (i.e., uptake 2) contribute meaningfully to regulation of monoamine neurotransmitter signalling. However, studying behavioural influences of uptake 2 is hindered by an absence of selective inhibitors largely free of off-target, confounding effects. This contrasts with study of monoamine transporters with low transport capacity but high substrate affinity (i.e., uptake 1), for which there are many reasonably selective inhibitors. To circumvent this dearth of pharmacological tools for studying uptake 2, researchers have instead employed mice with constitutive genetic deficiency in three separate transporters. By studying baseline behavioural shifts, plus behavioural responses to environmental and pharmacological manipulations-the latter primarily targeting uptake 1-investigators have been creatively characterizing the behavioural, and often sex-specific, influences of uptake 2. This non-systematic mini review summarizes current uptake 2 behaviour literature, highlighting emphases on stress responsivity in organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2) work, psychostimulant responsivity in OCT3 and plasma membrane monoamine transporter (PMAT) investigations, and antidepressant responsivity in all three. Collectively, this small but growing body of work reiterates the necessity for development of selective uptake 2-inhibiting drugs, with reviewed studies suggesting that these might advance personalized treatment approaches.
Keyphrases