Costs of unicompartmental compared with total knee arthroplasty : a matched cohort study over ten years.
Robert A Burnett IiiJaeWon YangP Maxwell CourtneyE Bailey TerhuneCharles P HannonCraig J Della VallePublished in: The bone & joint journal (2021)
Despite higher revision rates, patients undergoing UKA had lower mean healthcare costs than those undergoing TKA up to ten years following the procedure, at which time costs were comparable. In the era of value-based care, surgeons and policymakers should be aware of the costs involved with these procedures. UKA was associated with fewer complications at one year postoperatively but higher revision rates at five and ten years. While UKA was significantly less costly than TKA at one and five years, costs at ten years were comparable with a mean difference of only $14. Lowering the risk of revision surgery should be targeted as a source of cost savings for both UKA and TKA as the mean related healthcare costs were 2.5-fold higher in patients requiring revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):23-31.
Keyphrases
- total knee arthroplasty
- total hip
- healthcare
- minimally invasive
- patients undergoing
- end stage renal disease
- quality improvement
- palliative care
- chronic kidney disease
- coronary artery bypass
- coronary artery disease
- ejection fraction
- cancer therapy
- bone mineral density
- total hip arthroplasty
- acute coronary syndrome
- drug delivery
- body composition
- patient reported outcomes