Impacts of gold nanoparticle charge and ligand type on surface binding and toxicity to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
Z Vivian FengIan L GunsolusTian A QiuKatie R HurleyLyle H NybergHilena FrewKyle P JohnsonAriane M VartanianLisa M JacobSamuel E LohseMarco D TorelliRobert John HamersCatherine J MurphyChristy L HaynesPublished in: Chemical science (2015)
Although nanomaterials facilitate significant technological advancement in our society, their potential impacts on the environment are yet to be fully understood. In this study, two environmentally relevant bacteria, Shewanella oneidensis and Bacillus subtilis, have been used as model organisms to elucidate the molecular interactions between these bacterial classes and Au nanoparticles (AuNPs) with well-controlled and well-characterized surface chemistries: anionic 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), cationic 3-mercaptopropylamine (MPNH2), and the cationic polyelectrolyte poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH). The data demonstrate that cationic, especially polyelectrolyte-wrapped AuNPs, were more toxic to both the Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The levels of toxicity observed were closely related to the percentage of cells with AuNPs associated with the cell surface as measured in situ using flow cytometry. The NP concentration-dependent binding profiles were drastically different for the two bacteria strains, suggesting the critical role of bacterial cell surface chemistry in determining nanoparticle association, and thereby, biological impact.
Keyphrases
- gram negative
- cell surface
- multidrug resistant
- flow cytometry
- bacillus subtilis
- induced apoptosis
- escherichia coli
- cell cycle arrest
- cell death
- electronic health record
- transcription factor
- binding protein
- endoplasmic reticulum stress
- machine learning
- signaling pathway
- artificial intelligence
- sensitive detection
- pi k akt