Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Jayakumar SreenivasanRohin K ReddyYasser JamilAaqib H MalikDaniel ChamiéJames Philip HowardMichael G NannaGary S MintzAkiko MaeharaZiad A AliJeffrey W MosesShao-Liang ChenAlaide ChieffoAntonio ColomboMartin B LeonAlexandra J LanksyYousif AhmadPublished in: Journal of the American Heart Association (2024)
In patients undergoing PCI, intravascular imaging is associated with reductions in major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, stent thrombosis, target-lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. The magnitude of benefit is large and consistent across all included studies. There may also be benefits in all-cause death, particularly in complex lesion subsets. These results support the use of intravascular imaging as standard of care and updates of clinical guidelines.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- high resolution
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- acute myocardial infarction
- patients undergoing
- coronary artery
- coronary artery disease
- acute coronary syndrome
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- antiplatelet therapy
- left ventricular
- healthcare
- palliative care
- atrial fibrillation
- computed tomography
- pulmonary embolism
- pain management
- fluorescence imaging
- case control