Login / Signup

Variable Guidelines for Pediatric Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation Exists Across PRiSM Member Organizations.

Elliot GreenbergJoseph HannonNathan ChaclasJeffrey AlbaughJoseph Molonynull nullBrendan A Williams
Published in: HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery (2024)
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, typically used to restore stability to the patellofemoral joint after dislocation, often requires extensive rehabilitation to address acute impairment related to surgical intervention and also underlying non-anatomical deficits that may have contributed to the index injury. Rehabilitation guidelines, including objective functional performance assessment criteria, are lacking in the literature. We sought to summarize the clinical guidelines for rehabilitation and return to activity assessment after MPFL reconstruction as advocated by the member organizations of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Patellofemoral Research Interest Group (PF-RIG). We obtained and reviewed MPFL rehabilitation guidelines from 11 member organizations of the PRiSM PF-RIG, extracting information on weight-bearing advancement, bracing, use of supplemental strengthening modalities, and any objective criteria for advancing rehabilitation phases. We found highly variable agreement among guideline parameters at each treatment stage, with time-based criteria most widely used for early progression. Although functional metrics like strength or movement tests were more widely used in later phases of rehabilitation, there was substantial variation in testing mode and level of acceptable performance. Our review found that significant variability exists in current practice among PRiSM and PF-RIG member institutions regarding rehabilitation standards after MPFL reconstruction. Although we found broad consensus that objective strength or performance criteria should be employed to establish a better framework for clinical decision-making, most current guidelines lack standardization and sufficient detail to guide ideal clinical practice.
Keyphrases