Login / Signup

RELEVANCE OF DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS IN CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DEMYELINATING POLIRADICULONEUROPATHY: DATA FROM THE ITALIAN CIDP DATABASE.

Giuseppe LiberatoreFiore ManganelliDario CocitoRaffaella FazioChiara BrianiMassimiliano FilostoLuana BenedettiGiovanni AntoniniGiuseppe CosentinoStefano JannAnna MazzeoAndrea CorteseGirolama Alessandra MarfiaAngelo Maurizio ClericiGabriele SicilianoMarinella CarpoMario SabatelliGiuseppe Lauria PinterTiziana RossoEduardo Nobile Orazionull null
Published in: Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS (2020)
Background and aims to report the clinical features and the relevance of diagnostic investigations in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIDP included in a national database. Among the 500 included patients with a clinical diagnosis of CIDP, 437 patients (87%) fulfilled the EFNS/PNS criteria for CIDP (definite in 407, probable in 26, possible in four). In 352 patients (86%) motor nerve conduction abnormalities consistent with demyelination were sufficient for the diagnosis of definite CIDP. In 55 patients this diagnosis required the addition of one or two (from probable or from possible CIDP, respectively) supportive tests, while in 20 cases they improved the diagnosis from possible to probable CIDP, seven patients did not change diagnosis. Considering these 85 patients, CSF studies were performed in 79 cases (93%) upgrading the certainty of diagnosis in 59% of examined patients. Sensory nerve conduction studies were performed in 85% of patients with an improvement of diagnosis in 32% of cases. Nerve biopsy and US/MRI exams resulted positive in about 40% of examined patients, but they were performed in few patients (7 patients and 16 patients, respectively). A response to therapy was present in 84% of treated patients (n = 77), contributing to support the diagnosis in 40 patients in whom the other supportive criteria were not sufficient. In most patients with CIDP the diagnosis is possible solely with motor nerve conduction studies while other investigations may help improving the diagnosis in a minority of patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keyphrases
  • end stage renal disease
  • newly diagnosed
  • ejection fraction
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • prognostic factors
  • emergency department
  • cell therapy
  • electronic health record
  • adverse drug
  • patient reported