A Smartphone App for Real-Time Assessment of Malaria Prophylaxis Adverse Events.
Natalia RodriguezMaria Jesus Ledesma-CarbayoHelena Martí-SolerDaniel Cuadrado SanchezAlexander VladimirovDaniel Camprubí-FerrerMaria Jesus PinazoIrene LosadaAlex Almuedo-RieraLucia RomeroAnna RomanIsabel VeraMontserrat Roldan-TorralvoElisabeth FerrerTeresa de AlbaAlejandra JimenezJuan Jose Gómez-ValverdeJose MuñozMiguel Luengo OrozPublished in: Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association (2024)
Background: Growth of international travel to malarial areas over the last decades has contributed to more travelers taking malaria prophylaxis. Travel-related symptoms may be wrongly attributed to malaria prophylaxis and hinder compliance. Here, we aimed to assess the frequency of real-time reporting of symptoms by travelers following malaria prophylaxis using a smartphone app. Method: Adult international travelers included in this single-center study (Barcelona, Spain) used the smartphone Trip Doctor ® app developed by our group for real-time tracking of symptoms and adherence to prophylaxis. Results: Six hundred four ( n = 604) international travelers were included in the study; 74.3% (449) used the app daily, and for one-quarter of travelers, malaria prophylaxis was prescribed. Participants from the prophylaxis group traveled more to Africa (86.7% vs. 4.3%; p < 0.01) and to high travel medical risk countries (60.8% vs. 18%; p < 0.01) and reported more immunosuppression (30.8% vs. 23.1% p < 0.01). Regarding symptoms, no significant intergroup differences were observed, and no relationship was found between the total number of malarial pills taken and reported symptoms. Conclusions: In our cohort, the number of symptoms due to malaria prophylaxis was not significantly higher than in participants for whom prophylaxis was not prescribed, and the overall proportion of symptoms is higher compared with other studies.