Login / Signup

Local control of sphincter-preserving procedures and abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer: Propensity score matched analysis.

Ryosuke OkamuraKoya HidaTomohiro YamaguchiTomonori AkagiTsuyoshi KonishiMichio YamamotoMitsuyoshi OtaShuichiro MatobaHiroyuki BandoSaori GotoYoshiharu SakaiMasahiko Watanabenull nullKazuteru WatanabeKoki OtsukaIchiro TakemasaKeitaro TanakaMasataka IkedaChu MatsudaMeiki FukudaJunichi HasegawaShintaro AkamotoManabu ShiozawaAtsushi TsurutaTakashi AkiyoshiTakeshi KatoShunsuke TsukamotoMasaaki ItoMasaki NaitoAkiyoshi KanazawaTakao TakahashiTakashi UekiYuri HayashiSatoshi MoritaTakashi YamaguchiMasayoshi NakanishiHirotoshi HasegawaKen OkamotoFuminori TeraishiYasuo SumiJo TashiroToshimasa YatsuokaYoji NishimuraKenji OkitaTakaya KobatakeHisanaga HorieYasuyuki MiyakuraHisashi RoKunihiko NagakariEiji HidakaTakehiro UmemotoHideaki NishigoriKohei MurataFuminori WakayamaRyoji MakizumiShoichi FujiiEiji SunamiHirotoshi KobayashiRyosuke NakagawaToshiyuki EnomotoShinobu OhnumaJun HigashijimaHeita OzawaKeigo AshidaFumihiko FujitaKeisuke UeharaSatoshi MaruyamaMasato OhyamaSeiichiro YamamotoTakao HinoiMasanori YoshimitsuMasazumi OkajimaShu TanimuraMasayasu KawasakiYoshihito IdeShoichi HazamaJun WatanabeDaisuke InagakiAkihiro Toyokawa
Published in: Annals of gastroenterological surgery (2017)
Sphincter-preserving procedures (SPPs) for surgical treatment of low-lying rectal tumors have advanced considerably. However, their oncological safety for locally advanced low rectal cancer compared with abdominoperineal resection (APR) is contentious. We retrospectively analyzed cohort data of 1500 consecutive patients who underwent elective resection for stage II-III rectal cancer between 2010 and 2011. Patients with tumors 2-5 cm from the anal verge and clinical stage T3-4 were eligible. Primary outcome was 3-year local recurrence rate, and confounding effects were minimized by propensity score matching. The study involved 794 patients (456 SPPs and 338 APR). Before matching, candidates for APR were more likely to have lower and advanced lesions, whereas SPPs were carried out more often following preoperative treatment, by laparoscopic approach, and at institutions with higher case volume. After matching, 398 patients (199 each for SPPs and APR) were included in the analysis sample. Postoperative morbidity was similar between the SPPs and APR groups (38% vs 39%; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.27). Margin involvement was present in eight patients in the SPPs group (one and seven at the distal and radial margins, respectively) and in 12 patients in the APR group. No difference in 3-year local recurrence rate was noted between the two groups (11% vs 14%; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.42-1.41). In this observational study, comparability was ensured by adjusting for possible confounding factors. Our results suggest that SPPs and APR for locally advanced low rectal cancer have demonstrably equivalent oncological local control.
Keyphrases
  • rectal cancer
  • end stage renal disease
  • newly diagnosed
  • ejection fraction
  • chronic kidney disease
  • squamous cell carcinoma
  • patients undergoing
  • machine learning
  • patient reported outcomes
  • combination therapy