Login / Signup

Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study.

Steffan Holst HansenCarl Joakim BrandtJens Soendergaard
Published in: JMIR AI (2024)
Comparing ChatGPT-4 and Microsoft Bing for academic assistance revealed strengths and limitations. ChatGPT-4 excels in depth and relevance but falters in citation accuracy. Microsoft Bing is concise but lacks robust detail. Though both models have potential, neither can independently handle comprehensive academic tasks. As AI evolves, combining ChatGPT-4's depth with Microsoft Bing's up-to-date referencing could optimize academic support. Researchers should critically assess AI outputs to maintain academic credibility.
Keyphrases
  • artificial intelligence
  • healthcare
  • medical students
  • primary care
  • optical coherence tomography
  • human health
  • risk assessment
  • single cell