Login / Signup

Genetically adjusted PSA levels for prostate cancer screening.

Linda KachuriThomas J HoffmannYu JiangSonja I BerndtJohn P ShelleyKerry R SchafferMitchell J MachielaNeal D FreedmanWen-Yi HuangShengchao A LiRyder EasterlinPhyllis J GoodmanCathee TillIan ThompsonHans G LiljaStephen K Van Den EedenStephen J ChanockChristopher A HaimanDavid V ContiRobert J KleinJonathan D MosleyRebecca E GraffJohn S Witte
Published in: Nature medicine (2023)
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer remains controversial because it increases overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant tumors. Accounting for genetic determinants of constitutive, non-cancer-related PSA variation has potential to improve screening utility. In this study, we discovered 128 genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10 -8 ) in a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of 95,768 men and developed a PSA polygenic score (PGS PSA ) that explains 9.61% of constitutive PSA variation. We found that, in men of European ancestry, using PGS-adjusted PSA would avoid up to 31% of negative prostate biopsies but also result in 12% fewer biopsies in patients with prostate cancer, mostly with Gleason score <7 tumors. Genetically adjusted PSA was more predictive of aggressive prostate cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 3.44, P = 6.2 × 10 -14 , area under the curve (AUC) = 0.755) than unadjusted PSA (OR = 3.31, P = 1.1 × 10 -12 , AUC = 0.738) in 106 cases and 23,667 controls. Compared to a prostate cancer PGS alone (AUC = 0.712), including genetically adjusted PSA improved detection of aggressive disease (AUC = 0.786, P = 7.2 × 10 -4 ). Our findings highlight the potential utility of incorporating PGS for personalized biomarkers in prostate cancer screening.
Keyphrases
  • prostate cancer
  • radical prostatectomy
  • genome wide
  • dna methylation
  • gene expression
  • ultrasound guided