Login / Signup

The institutional workers of biomedical science: Legitimizing academic entrepreneurship and obscuring conflicts of interest.

Renata E AxlerFiona A MillerPascale LehouxTrudo Lemmens
Published in: Science & public policy (2017)
Given growing initiatives incentivizing academic researchers to engage in 'entrepreneurial' activities, this article examines how these academic entrepreneurs claim value in their entrepreneurial engagements, and navigate concerns related to conflicts of interest. Using data from qualitative interviews with twenty-four academic entrepreneurs in Canada, we show how these scientists value entrepreneurial activities for providing financial and intellectual resources to academic science, as well as for their potential to create impact through translation. Simultaneously, these scientists claimed to maintain academic norms of disinterested science and avoid conflicts of interest. Using theories of institutional work, we demonstrate how entrepreneurial scientists engage in processes of institutional change-through-maintenance, drawing on the maintenance of academic norms as institutional resources to legitimize entrepreneurial activities. As entrepreneurial scientists work to legitimize new zones of academic scientific practice, there is a need to carefully regulate and scrutinize these activities so that their potential harms do not become obscured.
Keyphrases
  • public health
  • medical students
  • primary care
  • systematic review
  • machine learning
  • climate change
  • risk assessment
  • big data
  • data analysis