Inferior Vena Caval Measures Do Not Correlate with Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time Change Measured Using a Wireless Doppler Patch in Healthy Volunteers.
Jon-Émile Stuart KennyRoss PragerPhilippe RolaGarett McCullochSarah AtwiChelsea E MundingJoseph K EiblKorbin HaycockPublished in: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2023)
(1) Background: The inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava (IVC), a non-invasive surrogate for right atrial pressure, is often used to predict whether a patient will augment stroke volume (SV) in response to a preload challenge. There is a correlation between changing stroke volume (SV ∆ ) and corrected flow time of the common carotid artery (ccFT ∆ ). (2) Objective: We studied the relationship between IVC collapsibility and ccFT ∆ in healthy volunteers during preload challenges. (3) Methods: A prospective, observational, pilot study in euvolemic, healthy volunteers with no cardiovascular history was undertaken in a local physiology lab. Using a tilt-table, we studied two degrees of preload augmentation from (a) supine to 30-degrees head-down and (b) fully-upright to 30-degrees head down. In the supine position, % of IVC collapse with respiration, sphericity index and portal vein pulsatility was calculated. The common carotid artery Doppler pulse was continuously captured using a wireless, wearable ultrasound system. (4) Results: Fourteen subjects were included. IVC % collapse with respiration ranged between 10% and 84% across all subjects. Preload responsiveness was defined as an increase in ccFT ∆ of at least 7 milliseconds. A total of 79% (supine baseline) and 100% (head-up baseline) of subjects were preload-responsive. No supine venous measures (including IVC % collapse) were significantly related to ccFT ∆ . (5) Conclusions: From head-up baseline, 100% of healthy subjects were 'preload-responsive' as per the ccFT ∆ . Based on the 42% and 25% IVC collapse thresholds in the supine position, only 50% and 71% would have been labeled 'preload-responsive'.