Login / Signup

Effort-cost computation in a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample: Differences among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.

Ying-Min ZouKe NiYan-Yu WangEn-Qing YuSimon S Y LuiFu-Chun ZhouHan-Xue YangAlex S CohenGregory P StraussEric F C CheungRaymond C K Chan
Published in: PsyCh journal (2019)
Amotivational symptoms are observed in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Effort-cost computation may be a potential contributor to amotivation transdiagnostically. This study examined effort-cost computation in these three diagnostic groups. This study recruited 141 outpatients (49 SCZ, 52 non-psychotic BD, and 40 non-psychotic MDD) and 57 healthy controls (HCs). We administered the Effort-Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT), which manipulated different levels of reward magnitude and probability relating to a high and low physical effort task. There were significant interactions between group and reward magnitude, group and reward probability, and group and expected value on the percentage of high-effort choices. SCZ, BD, and MDD patients made comparably fewer high-effort choices than HCs in the high-reward magnitude, high-reward probability, and high-expected-value conditions. Self-reported amotivation did not correlate with decision-making on the EEfRT. Our findings suggest that reduced effort expenditure for reward is a transdiagnostic phenotype in SCZ, BD, and MDD.
Keyphrases
  • major depressive disorder
  • bipolar disorder
  • decision making
  • mental health
  • prefrontal cortex
  • physical activity
  • newly diagnosed
  • patient reported outcomes
  • climate change