The identification of psychopathological markers has been the focus of several scientific fields. The results were inconsistent due to lack of a clear nosology. Network analysis, focusing on the interactions between symptoms, provided important insights into the nosology of mental disorders. These interactions originate several topological properties that could constitute markers of psychopathology. One of these properties is network connectivity, which has been explored in recent years. However, the results have been inconsistent, and the topological properties of psychopathological networks remain largely unexplored and unknown. We compared several topological properties (i.e., connectivity, average path length, assortativity, average degree, modularity, global clustering) of psychopathological networks of healthy and disordered participants across depression (N = 2830), generalized anxiety (N = 13,463), social anxiety (N = 12,814), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (N = 16,426). Networks were estimated using Bayesian Gaussian Graphical Models. The Janson-Shannon measure of divergence was used to identify differences between the network properties. Network connectivity distinguished healthy and disordered participants' networks in all disorders. However, in depression and generalized anxiety, network connectivity was higher in healthy participants. The presence and number of motifs also distinguished the networks of healthy and disordered participants. Other topological properties (i.e., modularity, clustering, average path length and average degree) seem to be disorder-specific. The psychopathological significance of network connectivity must be clarified. Some topological properties of psychopathological networks are promising markers of psychopathology and may contribute to clarifying the nosology of mental disorders.