Against the Turn to Critical Race Theory and "Anti-racism" in Academic Medicine.
Thomas S HuddlePublished in: HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues (2022)
Medical academics are increasingly bringing critical race theory (CRT) or its corollaries to their discourse, to their curricula, and to their analyses of health and medical treatment disparities. The author argues that this is an error. The author considers the history of CRT, its claims, and its current presence in the medical literature. He contends that CRT is inimical to usual academic modes of inquiry and has obscured rather than aided the analysis of social and medical treatment disparities. Remedies for racism suggested by CRT advocates will not work and some of them will make things worse. Academic medicine should avoid the embrace of CRT and should maintain an allegiance to rigorous empirical inquiry and to treating patients not as essentialized ethnic group members but as individual human beings in need of care.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- end stage renal disease
- mental health
- ejection fraction
- endothelial cells
- newly diagnosed
- left ventricular
- chronic kidney disease
- palliative care
- affordable care act
- prognostic factors
- health insurance
- medical students
- risk assessment
- peritoneal dialysis
- atrial fibrillation
- climate change
- chronic pain
- living cells
- sensitive detection