Autologous Interposition Grafts for Mucosal Flap Septal Perforation Repair.
Stephen F BansbergCullen M TaylorMichael J MarinoAndy M CoursonAmar MiglaniPublished in: Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine (2023)
Background: Nasal septal perforation repair is commonly attempted utilizing bilateral nasal mucosal flaps supported with an interposition graft. Objectives: To compare the failure rates for bilateral flap repairs utilizing four different autologous interposition grafts. Methods: This is a retrospective review of a single surgeon's bilateral flap perforation repairs supported with an autologous interposition graft. Study inclusion over the 18-year review period required at least one examination 1 month after surgery. Repair failure rates were calculated and compared for each graft type, and logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis. Results: For the 356 study patients, median (range) age was 51 years (14-81) and 63.0% were women. Mean (range) perforation length was 13.9 mm (1-45). Median (range) at last follow-up was 11.2 months (1-192). Graft types used (percentage of patients and failure rate) were temporalis fascia (58.7/4.4), septal cartilage (23.3/7.3), auricular perichondrium (13.8/4.1), and septal bone (4.2/6.7) ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in bilateral mucosal flap perforation repair failure rate when either a temporalis fascia, septal cartilage, auricular perichondrium, or septal bone interposition graft was used.
Keyphrases
- soft tissue
- end stage renal disease
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- bone marrow
- breast reconstruction
- case report
- prognostic factors
- stem cells
- cell therapy
- peritoneal dialysis
- metabolic syndrome
- bone mineral density
- minimally invasive
- patient reported
- body composition
- insulin resistance
- atrial fibrillation
- data analysis
- robot assisted
- pregnancy outcomes
- breast cancer risk