Using a large-scale corpus of 706 coronavirus cartoons by male and female Arab artists, this study takes a fresh and more cognitive look at sexism in multimodal discourse. Specifically, it examines the role of salience and grammar (and hence of metaphor and metonymy) in gender bias and/or in discrimination against women. It argues that both men and women are vulnerable to the influence of stereotypical and outdated beliefs that create unconscious bias. But this raises the crucial issue of whether we can speak of 'overt' sexism in images. Issues around terminology and conceptualization are thus also investigated. Importantly, this paper makes the following contributions to feminist and cross-cultural pragmatics: (i) it brings a distinctly Arabic perspective to gender and language; (ii) it expands socio-cognitive pragmatics beyond spoken and written communication; (iii) it shows a close coupling between an Arabic grammar and other aspects of culture; and (iv) it has the potential for impact beyond academia, specifically in the sphere of coronavirus care or of health communication.
Keyphrases
- sars cov
- healthcare
- mental health
- coronavirus disease
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- public health
- pain management
- palliative care
- deep learning
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- autism spectrum disorder
- human health
- functional connectivity
- atomic force microscopy
- optical coherence tomography
- adipose tissue
- pregnancy outcomes
- type diabetes
- risk assessment
- skeletal muscle
- cervical cancer screening
- mass spectrometry
- ionic liquid
- breast cancer risk