Login / Signup

Design and implementation of community consultation for research conducted under exception from informed consent regulations for the PreVent and the PreVent 2 trials: Changes over time and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tom GugelKaren AdamsMadelon BaranoskiN David YanezMichael KamppTesheia JohnsonAni AydinElaine C FajardoEmily Schoenhofen SharpAartee PotnisChanel JohnsonMiriam M Treggiari
Published in: Clinical trials (London, England) (2024)
The PreVent experience illustrated operational advantages and disadvantages to community consultation conducted primarily by telephone, in-person events, or online activities. Approaches to enhance community acceptance included partnering with community leaders to optimize the communication strategies and trust building with the involvement of Institutional Review Board representatives during community meetings. Researchers might need to pivot from in-person planning to virtual techniques while maintaining the ability to engage with the public with two-way communication approaches. Due to less active engagement, and potential for selection bias in the responders, further research is needed to address the costs and benefits of virtual community consultation and public disclosure activities compared to in-person events.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • social media
  • primary care
  • risk assessment