Cardiogenic Shock Does Not Portend Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Eva SteinacherFelix HoferNiema KazemAndreas HammerLorenz KollerIrene M LangChristian HengstenbergAlexander NiessnerPatrick SulzgruberPublished in: Journal of personalized medicine (2022)
Although a strong association of cardiogenic shock (CS) with in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is well established, less attention has been paid to its prognostic influence on long-term outcome. We evaluated the impact of CS in 1173 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions between 1997 and 2009. Patients were followed up until the primary study endpoint (cardiovascular mortality) was reached. Within the entire study population, 112 (10.4%) patients presented with CS at admission. After initial survival, CS had no impact on mortality (non-CS: 23.5% vs. CS: 24.0%; p = 0.923), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.81; p = 0.457). CS patients ≥ 55 years ( p = 0.021) with moderately or severely impaired left ventricular function (LVF; p = 0.039) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; p = 0.013) had increased risk of cardiovascular mortality during follow-up. The present investigation extends currently available evidence that cardiovascular survival in CS is comparable with non-CS patients after the acute event. CS patients over 55 years presenting with impaired LVF and CKD at the time of ACS are at increased risk for long-term mortality and could benefit from personalized secondary prevention.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- patients undergoing
- ejection fraction
- peritoneal dialysis
- newly diagnosed
- left ventricular
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- prognostic factors
- emergency department
- heart failure
- risk factors
- physical activity
- patient reported outcomes
- type diabetes
- coronary artery
- aortic valve
- radiofrequency ablation