Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation.
Goran I BenicDaniel Stefan ThomaRonald E JungIgnacio Sanz-MartinSilvan UngerAntonio CantalapiedraChristoph H F HämmerlePublished in: Clinical oral implants research (2017)
GBR with bone substitute blocks lead to higher ridge dimensions than empty controls. The equine block with CM rendered the most favorable outcomes in hard and soft tissue contours followed by DBBM block and DBBM granulate with CM.