Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: The next gold standard? No! (or not yet!).
Marcelo Langer WroclawskiSaulo Borborema TelesArie CarneiroPublished in: Andrologia (2020)
Most cases of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia are initially managed through medical therapy. In cases that surgery is indicated, the anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (aEEP), first described in 1983, allegedly presents the same safety profile as the best endoscopic non-enucleating procedures and the same long-term functional outcomes as simple prostatectomy. Thus, why aEEP has not yet been consolidated as the gold-standard BPH surgical treatment? The main reasons are as follows: (a) Multiple energy sources and techniques; (b) High costs; (c) Steep learning curve; (d) Rare in-residency training; (e) Reimbursement issues; (f) Outcomes and (g) Complications. We do believe aEEP is an important advance and a "practice-changing" procedure that will play an important role in the BPH surgical options arsenal, especially for larger prostates. However, there is a need to start an in-residency training program, with a mentor guidance, and, over time, the cost will likely be reduced due to greater competition between companies and greater support from health insurers. Considering these points, in the future, EEP may be considered the gold-standard treatment for BPH… but not yet.
Keyphrases
- benign prostatic hyperplasia
- lower urinary tract symptoms
- ultrasound guided
- healthcare
- minimally invasive
- public health
- primary care
- prostate cancer
- mental health
- coronary artery bypass
- drinking water
- medical students
- mesenchymal stem cells
- bone marrow
- skeletal muscle
- quality improvement
- health information
- surgical site infection
- atrial fibrillation
- replacement therapy