Login / Signup

Implementation and function of interdisciplinary rounds: An observational multisite hospital study from project ACHIEVE.

Nikita VundiJessica M ClouserAkosua K AduJing Li
Published in: Journal of hospital medicine (2023)
Hospitals varied significantly in IDR implementation. 51.9% included the "core" team (i.e., a physician, nurse, pharmacist, and case manager/social worker), though all included a case manager or social worker. Most (81.5%) occurred before noon. Content chiefly focused on medical care (74.1 to 92.6%) with patient responsibilities and preferences being less frequently discussed (25.9 to 40.7%). Bivariate analyses revealed that afternoon rounds were more likely to include dischargeȐrelated topics, such as patient/caregiver preferences (100% vs. 27.3%, p = .003) and follow-up needs (100% vs. 36.4%, p = .010).When IDR occurred at bedside, financial resources were more often assessed (100% vs. 34.8%, p = .015) and patient's ability to obtain medication was more often anticipated (75% vs. 21.7%, p = .031).
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • quality improvement
  • case report
  • mental health
  • emergency department
  • decision making
  • adverse drug
  • health insurance
  • acute care