Login / Signup

Exploring the clinical features of narcolepsy type 1 versus narcolepsy type 2 from European Narcolepsy Network database with machine learning.

Zhongxing ZhangGeert MayerYves DauvilliersGiuseppe PlazziFabio PizzaRolf FronczekJoan SantamariaMarkku PartinenSebastiaan OvereemRosa Peraita-AdradosAntonio Martins da SilvaKarel SonkaRafael Del Rio-VillegasRaphael HeinzerAleksandra WierzbickaPeter YoungBirgit HöglClaudio L BassettiMauro ManconiEva FeketeovaJohannes MathisTeresa PaivaFrancesca CanellasMichel LecendreuxChristian R BaumannLucie BarateauCarole PesentiElena AntelmiCarles GaigAlex IranzoLaura Lillo-TrigueroPablo Medrano-MartínezJosé Haba-RubioCorina GorbanGianina LucaGert Jan LammersRamin Khatami
Published in: Scientific reports (2018)
Narcolepsy is a rare life-long disease that exists in two forms, narcolepsy type-1 (NT1) or type-2 (NT2), but only NT1 is accepted as clearly defined entity. Both types of narcolepsies belong to the group of central hypersomnias (CH), a spectrum of poorly defined diseases with excessive daytime sleepiness as a core feature. Due to the considerable overlap of symptoms and the rarity of the diseases, it is difficult to identify distinct phenotypes of CH. Machine learning (ML) can help to identify phenotypes as it learns to recognize clinical features invisible for humans. Here we apply ML to data from the huge European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) that contains hundreds of mixed features of narcolepsy making it difficult to analyze with classical statistics. Stochastic gradient boosting, a supervised learning model with built-in feature selection, results in high performances in testing set. While cataplexy features are recognized as the most influential predictors, machine find additional features, e.g. mean rapid-eye-movement sleep latency of multiple sleep latency test contributes to classify NT1 and NT2 as confirmed by classical statistical analysis. Our results suggest ML can identify features of CH on machine scale from complex databases, thus providing 'ideas' and promising candidates for future diagnostic classifications.
Keyphrases