Login / Signup

Validation of pitchAI TM markerless motion capture using marker-based 3D motion capture.

Tyler J DobosRyan W G BenchColin D McKinnonAnthony BradyKyle J BoddyMichael W R HolmesMichael W L Sonne
Published in: Sports biomechanics (2022)
This study sought to compare and validate baseball pitching mechanics, including joint angles and spatiotemporal parameters, from a single camera markerless motion capture solution with a 3D optical marker-based system. Ten healthy pitchers threw 2-3 maximum effort fastballs while concurrently using marker-based optical capture and pitchAI TM (markerless) motion capture. Time-series measures were compared using R -squared (r 2 ), and root mean square error (RMSE). Discrete kinematic measures at foot plant, maximal shoulder external rotation, and ball release, plus four spatiotemporal parameters were evaluated using descriptive statistics, Bland-Altman analyses, Pearson's correlation coefficients, p-values, r 2 , and RMSE. For time-series angles, r 2 ranged from 0.69 (glove arm shoulder external rotation) to 0.98 (trunk and pelvis rotation), and RMSE ranged from 4.37° (trunk lateral tilt) to 20.78° (glove arm shoulder external rotation). Bias for individual joint angle and spatiotemporal parameters ranged from -11.31 (glove arm shoulder horizontal abduction; MER) to 12.01 (ball visible). RMSE was 3.62 m/s for arm speed, 5.75% height for stride length and 21.75 ms for the ball visible metric. pitchAI TM can be recommended as a markerless alternative to marker-based motion capture for quantifying pitching kinematics. A database of pitchAI TM ranges should be established for comparison between systems.
Keyphrases
  • high speed
  • high resolution
  • rotator cuff
  • body mass index
  • mass spectrometry
  • emergency department
  • ms ms
  • heart rate
  • convolutional neural network
  • solid state
  • clinical evaluation
  • monte carlo