Login / Signup

Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair.

Craig J AndersonLana TalmaneJuliet LuftJohn ConnellyMichael D NicholsonJan C VerburgOriol PichSusan CampbellMarco GiaisiPei-Chi WeiVasavi SundaramFrances ConnorPaul A GinnoTakayo SasakiDavid M Gilbertnull nullNúria López-BigasColin A SempleDuncan T OdomSarah J AitkenMartin S Taylor
Published in: Nature (2024)
DNA base damage is a major source of oncogenic mutations 1 . Such damage can produce strand-phased mutation patterns and multiallelic variation through the process of lesion segregation 2 . Here we exploited these properties to reveal how strand-asymmetric processes, such as replication and transcription, shape DNA damage and repair. Despite distinct mechanisms of leading and lagging strand replication 3,4 , we observe identical fidelity and damage tolerance for both strands. For small alkylation adducts of DNA, our results support a model in which the same translesion polymerase is recruited on-the-fly to both replication strands, starkly contrasting the strand asymmetric tolerance of bulky UV-induced adducts 5 . The accumulation of multiple distinct mutations at the site of persistent lesions provides the means to quantify the relative efficiency of repair processes genome wide and at single-base resolution. At multiple scales, we show DNA damage-induced mutations are largely shaped by the influence of DNA accessibility on repair efficiency, rather than gradients of DNA damage. Finally, we reveal specific genomic conditions that can actively drive oncogenic mutagenesis by corrupting the fidelity of nucleotide excision repair. These results provide insight into how strand-asymmetric mechanisms underlie the formation, tolerance and repair of DNA damage, thereby shaping cancer genome evolution.
Keyphrases
  • dna damage
  • oxidative stress
  • genome wide
  • dna repair
  • diabetic rats
  • single molecule
  • transcription factor
  • circulating tumor
  • cell free
  • single cell
  • copy number
  • circulating tumor cells