Login / Signup

Effect of processing speed and memory performance on classification accuracy of the dot counting test in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample.

Matthew S PhillipsAmanda M WisingerBrian M CernyHumza KhanFini ChangKa Yin Phoebe TseGabriel P OvsiewZachary J ReschGreg ShapiroJason R SobleKyle J Jennette
Published in: Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology (2024)
Findings support the DCT as a non-memory-based freestanding PVT for use with single-domain cognitive impairment, with traditional E-score ≥17 (unrounded E-score ≥16.95) recommended for those with memory impairment and traditional E-score ≥19 (unrounded ≥18.08) with processing speed impairment. Moreover, results replicated previously established optimal cutoffs for unimpaired groups using both the traditional (≥14) and unrounded (≥13.84) E-scores. However, the DCT did not reliably discriminate between invalid performance and multidomain cognitive impairment, indicating caution is warranted when using the DCT with patients suspected of greater cognitive impairment.
Keyphrases
  • cognitive impairment
  • working memory
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • chronic kidney disease
  • machine learning
  • prognostic factors
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • deep learning
  • pulmonary embolism