Login / Signup

Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO 2 .

Kevin RennertFrank ErricksonBrian C PrestLisa RennelsRichard G NewellWilliam PizerCora KingdonJordan WingenrothRoger CookeBryan ParthumDavid SmithKevin R CromarDelavane DiazFrances C MooreUlrich K MüllerRichard J PlevinAdrian E RafteryHana ŠevčíkováHannah SheetsJames H StockTammy TanMark WatsonTony E WongDavid Anthoff
Published in: Nature (2022)
The social cost of carbon dioxide (SC-CO 2 ) measures the monetized value of the damages to society caused by an incremental metric tonne of CO 2 emissions and is a key metric informing climate policy. Used by governments and other decision-makers in benefit-cost analysis for over a decade, SC-CO 2 estimates draw on climate science, economics, demography and other disciplines. However, a 2017 report by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 1 (NASEM) highlighted that current SC-CO 2 estimates no longer reflect the latest research. The report provided a series of recommendations for improving the scientific basis, transparency and uncertainty characterization of SC-CO 2 estimates. Here we show that improved probabilistic socioeconomic projections, climate models, damage functions, and discounting methods that collectively reflect theoretically consistent valuation of risk, substantially increase estimates of the SC-CO 2 . Our preferred mean SC-CO 2 estimate is $185 per tonne of CO 2 ($44-$413 per tCO 2 : 5%-95% range, 2020 US dollars) at a near-term risk-free discount rate of 2%, a value 3.6 times higher than the US government's current value of $51 per tCO 2 . Our estimates incorporate updated scientific understanding throughout all components of SC-CO 2 estimation in the new open-source Greenhouse Gas Impact Value Estimator (GIVE) model, in a manner fully responsive to the near-term NASEM recommendations. Our higher SC-CO 2 values, compared with estimates currently used in policy evaluation, substantially increase the estimated benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation and thereby increase the expected net benefits of more stringent climate policies.
Keyphrases
  • climate change
  • public health
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • carbon dioxide
  • preterm infants
  • clinical practice
  • drug delivery
  • gestational age