Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation.
André StrahlChristian GerlichGeorg W AlpersKatja EhrmannJörg GehrkeAnnette Müller-GarnnHeiner VogelPublished in: BMC medical education (2018)
Concordance with the main criterion was relevant but not significant (p = 0.2) higher for SPT than for the control condition. Fleiss' kappa coefficient showed that peer concordance was higher for SPT than randomly expected. Nevertheless, a score of 0.39 for the main criterion indicated only fair inter-rater reliability, considerably lower than the conventional standard of 0.7 for adequate reliability.