Login / Signup

Anticoagulation and bleeding in the cancer patient.

Andres EscobarAhmed M SalemKodwo DicksonTami N JohnsonKathyrn J BurkLara BashouraSaadia A Faiz
Published in: Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (2022)
Cancer patients have an increased risk of bleeding compared to non-cancer patients with anticoagulant therapy. A bleeding risk assessment before initiation of anticoagulation is recommended. Currently low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the mainstays of treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Since DOACs are administered orally, they offer some convenience and ease of administration; however, LMWH may be preferred in certain cancers. Given the prevalence of anticoagulant therapies in cancer patients, clinical providers must be able to recognize potentially critical bleeding sites and modalities to reverse major hemorrhage. Reversal agents or antidotes to bleeding may be required when bleeding is persistent or life-threatening. These include vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), protamine, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or andexanet alfa, and idarucizumab. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion can be also considered in those with major bleeding. Evidence for timing and need for re-initiation of anticoagulant therapy after a major bleeding remains sparse, but a multi-disciplinary approach and shared decision-making can be implemented in the interim.
Keyphrases
  • venous thromboembolism
  • atrial fibrillation
  • direct oral anticoagulants
  • inferior vena cava
  • risk assessment
  • stem cells
  • replacement therapy
  • cell therapy
  • mesenchymal stem cells