Incidence and Risk Factors for Long-Term Persistence of Diastolic Dysfunction after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis Compared with Aortic Regurgitation.
Luminita IliuțăAndreea Gabriella AndronesiAlexandru Scafa-UdrișteBogdan RădulescuHorațiu MoldovanFlorentina Ligia FurtunescuEugenia PanaitescuPublished in: Journal of cardiovascular development and disease (2023)
(1) Background: Severe left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction with a restrictive diastolic pattern (LVDFP) is generally associated with a worse prognosis. Its evolution and reversibility in the short- and medium-term after aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been little-studied. We aimed to evaluate the evolution of LV remodeling and LV systolic and diastolic function after AVR in aortic stenosis (AS) patients compared to aortic regurgitation (AR). Moreover, we tried to identify the main predictive parameters for postoperative evolution (cardiovascular hospitalization or death and quality of life) and the independent predictors for the persistence of restrictive LVDFP after AVR. (2) Methods: A five-year prospective study on 397 patients undergoing AVR for AS (226 pts) or AR (171 pts), evaluated clinically and by echocardiography preoperatively and until 5 years postoperatively. (3) Results: 1. In patients with AS, early post AVR, LV dimensions decreased and diastolic filling and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) improved more rapidly compared to patients with AR. At 1 year postoperatively, persistent restrictive LVDFP was found especially in the AR group compared to the AS group (36.84% vs. 14.16%). 2. Cardiovascular event-free survival at the 5-year follow-up was lower in the AR group (64.91% vs. 87.17% in the AS group). The main independent predictors of short- and medium-term prognosis after AVR were: restrictive LVDFP, severe LV systolic dysfunction, severe pulmonary hypertension (PHT), advanced age, severe AR, and comorbidities. 3. The persistence of restrictive LVDFP after AVR was independently predicted by: preoperative AR, the E/Ea ratio > 12, the LA dimension index > 30 mm/m 2 , an LV endsystolic diameter (LVESD) > 55 mm, severe PHT, and associated second-degree MR ( p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: AS patients had an immediate postoperative evolution in terms of LV remodeling, and LV systolic and diastolic function were more favorable compared to those with AR. The restrictive LVDFP was reversible, especially after the AVR for AS. The main prognostic predictors were the presence of restrictive LVDFP, advanced age, preoperative AR, severe LV systolic dysfunction, and severe PHT.
Keyphrases
- aortic stenosis
- ejection fraction
- left ventricular
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- patients undergoing
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- early onset
- heart failure
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- mitral valve
- blood pressure
- aortic valve
- acute myocardial infarction
- left atrial
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- oxidative stress
- drug induced
- newly diagnosed
- magnetic resonance imaging
- free survival
- contrast enhanced
- pulmonary artery
- coronary artery
- optical coherence tomography