Comparative ejaculatory response, fresh and frozen semen quality and fertility to artificial vagina vs electroejaculation method of semen collection in mithun (Bos frontalis) bulls.
Saddamhusen Mabusab NadafNagaraj SudeepMoonmoon MechMeraj Haider KhanFazal Ali AhmedPerumal PonrajAbhijit MitraPublished in: Andrologia (2021)
The study aimed to describe a comparative ejaculatory response, fresh and frozen-thawed semen quality and fertility of semen collected by artificial vagina and electroejaculation in mithun. Experimental bulls were divided into two groups, G-I: young bulls (n = 4; 4-5 years of age) and G-II: older bulls (n = 4; 8-10 years of age). Sixteen ejaculates were collected from each group G-I (AV1 ) and G-II (AV2 ) by artificial vagina method (control). Thirty-six ejaculates were collected from the same bulls from each group G-I (EE1 ) and G-II (EE2 ) by electroejaculation method (treatment). The study did not reveal any significant (p > 0.05) difference in the ejaculatory responses between EE1 and EE2 . Mann-Whitney U test indicated that salivation discomfort sign score was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in EE1 . Fresh and frozen-thawed semen quality parameters, and motility and velocity profiles recorded by computer-assisted sperm analyser were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in electroejaculation than the artificial vagina. The conception rates (AV1 vs EE1 & AV2 vs EE2 ) at day 35-45 post insemination were nonsignificantly higher (p > 0.05) in the artificial vagina group. It concluded that, although artificial vagina method has better semen quality, nevertheless, electroejaculation has the potential for semen collection from free-range mithun bulls to incorporate in assisted reproductive technology procedures.