Usefulness of insertable cardiac monitors for risk stratification: current indications and clinical evidence.
Amira AssafDominic Amj TheunsMichelle MichelsJolien W Roos-HesselinkTamas Szili-TorokSing-Chien YapPublished in: Expert review of medical devices (2023)
Clinical data on the usefulness of ICMs in different patient populations is limited but most studies demonstrate early detection of clinically relevant arrhythmias, such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation. It is important to emphasize that the study populations usually comprise selected populations where conventional diagnostic methods fail to clarify the mechanism of symptoms. The effect of an ICM on prognosis by earlier detection of arrhythmias is difficult to demonstrate in populations with rare disease. Risk stratification in patients with cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders remains a niche indication for ICMs. The most important indication for an ICM remains unexplained syncope in patients at low risk of SCD. Given the device costs and uncertain clinical value of device-detected arrhythmias, it is unclear whether it is also useful in non-syncopal patients.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- atrial fibrillation
- heart failure
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- congenital heart disease
- patient reported outcomes
- machine learning
- pulmonary embolism
- coronary artery disease
- venous thromboembolism
- patient reported
- oral anticoagulants
- data analysis
- loop mediated isothermal amplification
- left atrial appendage