Login / Signup

Restoring tibial slope and sagittal alignment of the femoral component in unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty using conventional versus patient specific instrumentation.

Patrick SadoghiAlexander DraschlLukas LeitnerStefan Franz FischerauerAmir KoutpClemens ClarAndreas LeithnerAntonio Klasan
Published in: The journal of knee surgery (2023)
Restoring sagittal alignment in kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial to avoid patellofemoral joint instability and to restore an adequate range of motion (ROM). This prospective study compared the accuracy of conventional instrumentation (CI) versus patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in restoring sagittal alignment of KA TKA measured by the tibial slope and degree of flexion of the femoral component to the anterior femoral cortex. One hundred patients were randomized to receive either CI (n=50) or PSI (n=50) for KA TKA. Two observers measured pre- and postoperative X-rays to assess restoration of the tibial slope and sagittal flexion. Inter- and intraclass correlations were calculated, and postoperative tibial and femoral components were compared to preoperative anatomy. In 50 CI patients, 86% (n=43) had the tibial slope restored exactly, and no deviation greater than 1° was found. Deviations of 0°-1° were detected in 14% (n=7). In 50 patients of the PSI group, 56% (n=28) achieved an exact anatomic tibial slope restoration and 20% (n=10) showed an deviation greater than 2° compared to the preoperative measurement. Deviations ranging between 0-1° and 1-2° were found in 22% (n=11) and 2% (n=1) of cases, respectively. Sagittal alignment of the femoral component showed in both groups no deviation exceeding 1°. The restoration of sagittal alignment in KA TKA was statistically significantly differential distributed between CI and PSI (p=<0.001) without clinical relevance. We found that patient-specific instrumentation increased the odds for deviations >2° in tibial slope reconstructions from 0 to 0.20 ([95% CI 0.09-0.31]; p=0.001). Both conventional and patient-specific instrumentation revealed adequate results with respect to restoring sagittal alignment of the tibial and femoral component in kinematically aligned TKA. The conventional technique requires adequate adjustment of the intramedullary rod to avoid hyperflexion of the femoral component and attention must be paid when restoring the tibial slope using PSI.
Keyphrases
  • total knee arthroplasty
  • total hip
  • end stage renal disease
  • ejection fraction
  • patients undergoing
  • newly diagnosed
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • study protocol
  • neural network
  • image quality