What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?
Maryam GhadimiJason BirnbaumIhab R KamelClaude B SirlinVictoria ChernyakPublished in: European radiology (2021)
Depending on the LI-RADS version, 3-6% of LR-5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LR-5 criteria based on reported MFs. Key Points • Depending on the LI-RADS version, 3-6% of LR-5 observations in clinical practice do not meet LR-5 criteria based on reported major imaging features. • Assigning LR-5 category to observations without nonrim arterial-phase hyperenhancement was the most common error.