Evidence for misleading decision support in characterizing differences in tolerance to reduced central blood volume using measurements of tissue oxygenation.

Lower StO2 measured in patients during low flow states associated with significant hemorrhage does not necessarily translate to a more compromised physiological state, but may reflect a greater resistance to the onset of shock. Only the CRM was able to distinguish between HT and LT participants early in the course of hemorrhage, supported by a significantly greater ROC AUC (0.90) compared with STO2 (0.68). These results support the notion that measures of StO2 could be misleading for triage and resuscitation decision support.