Genome-wide association studies and polygenic risk scores for skin cancer: clinically useful yet?
M R RobertsM M AsgariAmanda Ewart TolandPublished in: The British journal of dermatology (2019)
Existing data indicate that PRS may offer small, but potentially meaningful, improvements to risk prediction. Additional research is needed to clarify the potential utility of PRS in cutaneous carcinomas. Clinical translation will require well-powered validation studies incorporating known risk factors to evaluate PRS as tools for screening. What's already known about this topic? Over 50 susceptibility loci for melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) have been identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) using variants identified from GWAS have also been developed for melanoma, BCC and cSCC, and investigated with respect to clinical risk prediction. What does this study add? This review provides an overview of GWAS findings and the potential clinical utility of PRS for melanoma, BCC and cSCC.
Keyphrases
- genome wide association
- skin cancer
- basal cell carcinoma
- squamous cell carcinoma
- risk factors
- case control
- genome wide association study
- gene expression
- copy number
- human health
- atomic force microscopy
- electronic health record
- genome wide
- artificial intelligence
- radiation therapy
- big data
- dna methylation
- high grade
- high resolution