Venous thromboprophylaxis in urological cancer surgery.
Wojciech MichalskiGrazyna PoniatowskaJoanna Jonska-GmyrekJakub KucharzPawel StelmasiakKarol NietupskiKatarzyna Ossolinska-SkurczynskaMichal SobieszczukTomasz DemkowPawel WiechnoPublished in: Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) (2019)
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major complication of cancer and its treatment, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. The appropriate choice of thromboprophylaxis method and duration is, therefore, of utmost importance. We conducted an extensive review of the literature concerning VTE in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancers. Special attention was paid to risk factors, different types of surgery (transurethral, pelvic, abdominal-open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted) and different medications used (heparins, vitamin K antagonists and new oral anticoagulants). Original papers, reviews and guidelines were identified in Medline database. The available data were then summarised for the purpose of this article. Venous thromboprophylaxis is obligatory in urological cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. Unless individual contraindications are recognised, the available guidelines should be followed. The variety of clinical scenarios and patients' comorbidities necessitate cooperation with other specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, etc.) in choosing the optimal management. Thrombosis risk must be carefully weighed against bleeding risk.
Keyphrases
- venous thromboembolism
- minimally invasive
- robot assisted
- direct oral anticoagulants
- patients undergoing
- papillary thyroid
- coronary artery bypass
- risk factors
- atrial fibrillation
- squamous cell
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- pulmonary embolism
- climate change
- lymph node metastasis
- clinical practice
- working memory
- childhood cancer
- emergency department
- coronary artery disease
- squamous cell carcinoma
- electronic health record
- acute coronary syndrome
- meta analyses