Coronary microvascular dysfunction assessment: A comparative analysis of procedural aspects.
Ilan MerdlerRyan WallaceAvantika BanerjeeGiorgio A MedrandaPavan ReddyMatteo CellamareCheng ZhangSevket Tolga OzturkVaishnavi SawantKassandra LopezItsik Ben-DorRon WaksmanBrian C CaseHayder D HashimPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2024)
Compared to DLHC, CMD assessment is safe and requires only slightly additional contrast use (10 mL) and slightly longer fluoroscopy time (2 min) without clinical implications. These findings emphasize the favorable safety and feasibility of invasive CMD assessment.