Login / Signup

Will clinical standards not be part of the choir? Harmonization between the HL7 gender harmony project model and the NASEM measuring sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation report in the United States.

Kellan E BakerD'Lane ComptonEthan D Fechter-LeggettChris GrassoClair A Kronk
Published in: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA (2022)
Both publications agree on core approaches to conceptualization and measurement of sex- and gender-related constructs. However, some clarifications could improve our ability to assess gender modality, alignment (or lack thereof) between gender identity and assigned gender at birth, and address both individual-level and population-level health inequities. By bridging the GHP and NASEM recommendations, we provide a path forward for implementation of sex- and gender-related EHR elements. Suggestions for implementation of gender identity, recorded sex or gender, and sex for clinical use are provided, along with semantic and functional justifications.
Keyphrases
  • mental health
  • healthcare
  • primary care
  • quality improvement
  • pregnant women
  • risk assessment
  • clinical practice
  • gestational age
  • human health