Imaging in blunt thoracic trauma: The importance of clinical correlation.
Sushil Allen LuisNandan S AnavekarPeter C SpittellKrishnaswamy ChandrasekaranPublished in: Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) (2018)
We present the case of a 26-year-old female restrained front-seat passenger who presents following a motor vehicle accident, with CT angiogram features suggestive of possible acute aortic injury. However, clinical features including relative hemodynamic stability and absence of typical symptoms were discordant with these imaging findings. This case illustrates that even with ECG-gating, CT angiogram artifact mimicking acute aortic injury may still occur. Careful evaluation and clinical correlation is of vital importance, both to ensure acute aortic injury is not missed and that patients are not erroneously sent for aortic surgery when there is no aortic injury. Careful clinical evaluation must be combined with imaging in all cases of suspected aortic trauma, and at times multimodality imaging is indicated to direct the decision making strategy.
Keyphrases
- aortic dissection
- aortic valve
- high resolution
- left ventricular
- liver failure
- pulmonary artery
- clinical evaluation
- computed tomography
- minimally invasive
- image quality
- dual energy
- end stage renal disease
- respiratory failure
- magnetic resonance imaging
- contrast enhanced
- heart failure
- trauma patients
- magnetic resonance
- peritoneal dialysis
- hepatitis b virus
- physical activity
- blood pressure
- depressive symptoms
- pulmonary arterial hypertension
- coronary artery disease
- positron emission tomography
- heart rate variability
- spinal cord injury
- pulmonary embolism
- pet ct
- sleep quality
- patient reported
- mechanical ventilation