Complications of leadless vs conventional (lead) artificial pacemakers - a retrospective review.
Yasar SattarWaqas UllahSohaib Sanan RoomiHiba RaufMaryam MukhtarAsrar AhmadZain AliMuhammad Shan-Ul- AbedinMohamed Chadi AlraiesPublished in: Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives (2020)
LPMs appear to have a better safety profile than CPMs. There was a low pocket site and lead-related infections in LPM as compared to CPM. However, LPM can have twice the risk of pericardial effusion than CPMs, but this was not statistically significant.
Keyphrases