Login / Signup

Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications.

Federica De MuzioRoberta FuscoCarmen CutoloGiuliana GiacobbeFederico BrunoPierpaolo PalumboGinevra DantiGiulia GrazziniFederica FlammiaAlessandra BorgheresiAndrea AgostiniFrancesca GrassiAndrea GiovagnoniVittorio MieleAntonio BarileVincenza Granata
Published in: Journal of clinical medicine (2023)
Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The "watch and wait" approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques.
Keyphrases