Login / Signup

High-throughput screening of spin states for transition metal complexes with spin-polarized extended tight-binding methods.

Hagen NeugebauerBenedikt BädorfSebastian EhlertAndreas HansenStefan Grimme
Published in: Journal of computational chemistry (2023)
The semiempirical GFNn-xTB ( n = 1 , 2 $$ n=1,2 $$ ) tight-binding methods are extended with a spin-dependent energy term (spin-polarization), enabling the fast and efficient screening of different spin states for transition metal complexes. While GFNn-xTB methods inherently can not differentiate properly between high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states, this shortcoming is corrected with the presented methods termed spGFNn-xTB. The performance of spGFNn-xTB methods for spin state energy splittings is evaluated on a newly compiled benchmark set of 90 complexes (27 HS and 63 LS complexes) containing 3d, 4d, and 5d transition metals (termed TM90S) employing DFT references at the TPSSh-D4/def2-QZVPP level of theory. The challenging TM90S set contains complexes with charges between - $$ - $$ 4 and +3, spin multiplicities between 1 and 6, and spin-splitting energies that range from - $$ - $$ 47.8 to 146.6 kcal/mol with a mean average of 32.2 kcal/mol. On this set the (sp)GFNn-xTB methods, the PM6-D3H4 method, and the PM7 method are evaluated with spGFN1-xTB yielding the lowest MAD of 19.6 kcal/mol followed by spGFN2-xTB with 24.8 kcal/mol. While for the 4d and 5d subsets small or no improvements are observed with spin-polarization, large improvements are obtained for the 3d subset with spGFN1-xTB yielding the smallest MAD of 14.2 kcal/mol followed by spGFN2-xTB with 17.9 kcal/mol and PM6-D3H4 with 28.4 kcal/mol. The correct sign of the spin state splittings is obtained with spGFN2-xTB in 89% of all cases closely followed by spGFN1-xTB with 88%. On the full set, a pure semiempirical vertical spGFN2-xTB//GFN2-xTB-based workflow for screening purposes yields a slightly better MAD of 22.2 kcal/mol due to error compensation, while being qualitative correct for one additional case. In combination with their low computational cost (scanning spin states in seconds), the spGFNn-xTB methods represent robust tools for pre-screening steps of spin state calculations and high-throughput workflows.
Keyphrases