Login / Signup

AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor-neutral reject analysis in radiography.

Kevin J LittleIngrid ReiserBruce ApgarPoonam DalalJaydev DaveRyan FisherKatie HulmeMary Ellen JafariEmily L MarshallStephen MeyerQuentin MooreNicole MurphyThomas NishinoKatelyn NyeKevin O'DonnellJohn SabolAdrian SanchezWilliam SensakovicLawrence TarboxRobert UzenoffAlisa Walz-FlanniganCharles WillisJie Zhang
Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics (2023)
Reject rate analysis is considered an integral part of a diagnostic radiography quality control (QC) program. A rejected image is a patient radiograph that was not presented to a radiologist for diagnosis and that contributes unnecessary radiation dose to the patient. Reject rates that are either too high or too low may suggest systemic department shortcomings in QC mechanisms. Due to the lack of standardization, reject data often cannot be easily compared between radiography systems from different vendors. The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to help standardize data elements that are required for comprehensive reject analysis and to propose data reporting and workflows to enable an effective and comprehensive reject rate monitoring program. Essential data elements, a proposed schema for classifying reject reasons, and workflow implementation options are recommended in this task group report.
Keyphrases
  • electronic health record
  • quality control
  • quality improvement
  • case report
  • emergency department
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • magnetic resonance
  • data analysis
  • tertiary care
  • adverse drug
  • contrast enhanced